[llvm] [VPlan] Add initial anlysis to infer scalar type of VPValues. (PR #69013)

[via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+//===- VPlanAnalysis.cpp - Various Analyses working on VPlan ----*- C++ -*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "VPlanAnalysis.h"
+#include "VPlan.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "vplan"
+
+Type *VPTypeAnalysis::inferScalarType(const VPBlendRecipe *R) {
+  Type *ResTy = inferScalarType(R->getIncomingValue(0));
+  for (unsigned I = 1, E = R->getNumIncomingValues(); I != E; ++I) {
+    VPValue *Inc = R->getIncomingValue(I);
+    assert(inferScalarType(Inc) == ResTy &&
+           "different types inferred for different incoming values");
+    CachedTypes[Inc] = ResTy;
+  }
+  return inferScalarType(R->getIncomingValue(0));
+}
+
+Type *VPTypeAnalysis::inferScalarType(const VPInstruction *R) {
+  switch (R->getOpcode()) {
+  case Instruction::Select: {
+    Type *ResTy = inferScalarType(R->getOperand(1));
+    VPValue *OtherV = R->getOperand(2);
+    assert(inferScalarType(OtherV) == ResTy &&
+           "different types inferred for different operands");
+    CachedTypes[OtherV] = ResTy;
+    return ResTy;
+  }
+  case VPInstruction::FirstOrderRecurrenceSplice:
+    return inferScalarType(R->getOperand(0));
+  default:
+    llvm_unreachable("Unhandled instruction!");
+  }
+}
+
+Type *VPTypeAnalysis::inferScalarType(const VPWidenRecipe *R) {
+  unsigned Opcode = R->getOpcode();
+  switch (Opcode) {
+  case Instruction::ICmp:
+  case Instruction::FCmp:
+    return IntegerType::get(Ctx, 1);
+  case Instruction::UDiv:
+  case Instruction::SDiv:
+  case Instruction::SRem:
+  case Instruction::URem:
+  case Instruction::Add:
+  case Instruction::FAdd:
+  case Instruction::Sub:
+  case Instruction::FSub:
+  case Instruction::Mul:
+  case Instruction::FMul:
+  case Instruction::FDiv:
+  case Instruction::FRem:
+  case Instruction::Shl:
+  case Instruction::LShr:
+  case Instruction::AShr:
+  case Instruction::And:
+  case Instruction::Or:
+  case Instruction::Xor: {
+    Type *ResTy = inferScalarType(R->getOperand(0));
+    assert(ResTy == inferScalarType(R->getOperand(1)) &&
+           "types for both operands must match for binary op");
+    CachedTypes[R->getOperand(1)] = ResTy;
+    return ResTy;
+  }
+  case Instruction::FNeg:
+  case Instruction::Freeze:
+    return inferScalarType(R->getOperand(0));
+  default:
+    break;
+  }
+
+  // Type inferrence not implemented for opcode.
+  LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found unhandled opcode: "
+                    << Instruction::getOpcodeName(Opcode));
+  llvm_unreachable("Unhandled opcode!");
+}
+
+Type *VPTypeAnalysis::inferScalarType(const VPWidenCallRecipe *R) {
+  auto &CI = *cast<CallInst>(R->getUnderlyingInstr());
+  return CI.getType();
+}
+
+Type *VPTypeAnalysis::inferScalarType(const VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipe *R) {
+  if (R->isStore())
+    return cast<StoreInst>(&R->getIngredient())->getValueOperand()->getType();
----------------
ayalz wrote:

(Independent Thought) Should VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipe use Underlying instead of `Ingredient`, consistent with other recipes?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69013