[llvm] [ValueTracking] Improve constant range computation for `shl` and `and`. (PR #68446)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 6 13:31:11 PDT 2023


llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

- [ValueTracking] Add more tests for constant ranges; NFC
- [ValueTracking] Add better support for ConstantRange(Shl)
- [ValueTracking] Add better support for ConstantRange(And)


---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68446.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp (+18) 
- (added) llvm/test/Analysis/ValueTracking/constant-ranges.ll (+132) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
index 3af5a6d9a167de4..7ca1e7de9ae96e0 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -8520,6 +8520,11 @@ static void setLimitsForBinOp(const BinaryOperator &BO, APInt &Lower,
     if (match(BO.getOperand(1), m_APInt(C)))
       // 'and x, C' produces [0, C].
       Upper = *C + 1;
+    // X & -X is a power of two or zero. So we can cap the value at max power of
+    // two.
+    if (match(BO.getOperand(0), m_Neg(m_Specific(BO.getOperand(1)))) ||
+        match(BO.getOperand(1), m_Neg(m_Specific(BO.getOperand(0)))))
+      Upper = APInt::getSignedMinValue(Width) + 1;
     break;
 
   case Instruction::Or:
@@ -8581,7 +8586,20 @@ static void setLimitsForBinOp(const BinaryOperator &BO, APInt &Lower,
           Lower = *C;
           Upper = C->shl(ShiftAmount) + 1;
         }
+      } else {
+        // If lowbit is set, value can never be zero.
+        if ((*C)[0])
+          Lower = APInt::getOneBitSet(Width, 0);
+        // If we are shifting a constant the largest it can be is if the longest
+        // sequence of consecutive ones is shifted to the highbits (breaking
+        // ties for which sequence is higher). At the moment we take a liberal
+        // upper bound on this by just popcounting the constant.
+        // TODO: There may be a bitwise trick for it longest/highest
+        // consecutative sequence of ones (naive method is O(Width) loop).
+        Upper = APInt::getHighBitsSet(Width, C->popcount()) + 1;
       }
+    } else if (match(BO.getOperand(1), m_APInt(C))) {
+      Upper = APInt::getBitsSetFrom(Width, C->getZExtValue()) + 1;
     }
     break;
 
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/ValueTracking/constant-ranges.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/ValueTracking/constant-ranges.ll
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000000..47680e32b89b41f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/ValueTracking/constant-ranges.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
+; RUN: opt -passes=instsimplify < %s -S | FileCheck %s
+
+define i1 @shl_C_X_ugt(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_C_X_ugt(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 false
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 7, %x
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 224
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_C_X_ugt2(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_C_X_ugt2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 false
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 5, %x
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 192
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_C_X_ugt_fail(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_C_X_ugt_fail(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i8 1, [[X:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[SHL]], 127
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[R]]
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 1, %x
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 127
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_C_X_ugt_fail2(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_C_X_ugt_fail2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i8 3, [[X:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[SHL]], -66
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[R]]
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 3, %x
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 190
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_C_X_ugt_fail3(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_C_X_ugt_fail3(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i8 -1, [[X:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[SHL]], -2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[R]]
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 -1, %x
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 254
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_C_X_ugt_todo(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_C_X_ugt_todo(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i8 -127, [[X:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[SHL]], -116
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[R]]
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 129, %x
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 140
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_X_C_ugt(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_X_C_ugt(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 false
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 %x, 6
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 192
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_X_C_ugt_fail(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_X_C_ugt_fail(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i8 [[X:%.*]], 6
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[SHL]], -65
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[R]]
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 %x, 6
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 191
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @shl_X_C_ugt_fail2(i8 %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @shl_X_C_ugt_fail2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i8 [[X:%.*]], 5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[SHL]], -64
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[R]]
+;
+  %shl = shl i8 %x, 5
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %shl, 192
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @and_ugt(i8 %xx, i8 %yy) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @and_ugt(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 false
+;
+  %x = or i8 %xx, %yy
+  %negx = sub i8 0, %x
+  %x_p2 = and i8 %negx, %x
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %x_p2, 128
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @and_ugt2(i8 %xx, i8 %yy) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @and_ugt2(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 false
+;
+  %x = or i8 %xx, %yy
+  %negx = sub i8 0, %x
+  %x_p2 = and i8 %x, %negx
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %x_p2, 128
+  ret i1 %r
+}
+
+define i1 @and_ugt_fail(i8 %xx, i8 %yy) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @and_ugt_fail(
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[X:%.*]] = or i8 [[XX:%.*]], [[YY:%.*]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[NEGX:%.*]] = sub i8 0, [[X]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[X_P2:%.*]] = and i8 [[X]], [[NEGX]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[R:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[X_P2]], 127
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i1 [[R]]
+;
+  %x = or i8 %xx, %yy
+  %negx = sub i8 0, %x
+  %x_p2 = and i8 %x, %negx
+  %r = icmp ugt i8 %x_p2, 127
+  ret i1 %r
+}

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68446


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list