[llvm] [BOLT] Support instrumentation hook via DT_FINI_ARRAY (PR #67348)

[Vladislav Khmelevsky via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -1276,6 +1282,69 @@ void RewriteInstance::discoverFileObjects() {
   registerFragments();
 }
 
+Error RewriteInstance::discoverRtFiniAddress() {
+  // If FiniFunctionAddress is already set, we got if from DT_FINI. We use
+  // DT_FINI instead of DT_FINI_ARRAY if it's available.
+  if (BC->FiniFunctionAddress)
+    return Error::success();
+
+  if (!BC->FiniArrayAddress || !BC->FiniArraySize) {
+    return createStringError(
+        std::errc::not_supported,
+        "Instrumentation needs either DT_FINI or DT_FINI_ARRAY");
+  }
+
+  if (*BC->FiniArraySize < BC->AsmInfo->getCodePointerSize()) {
+    return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
+                             "Need at least 1 DT_FINI_ARRAY slot");
+  }
+
+  ErrorOr<BinarySection &> FiniArraySection =
+      BC->getSectionForAddress(*BC->FiniArrayAddress);
+  if (auto EC = FiniArraySection.getError())
+    return errorCodeToError(EC);
+
+  BC->FiniArraySection = &*FiniArraySection;
+
+  if (const Relocation *Reloc = FiniArraySection->getDynamicRelocationAt(0)) {
+    BC->FiniFunctionAddress = Reloc->Addend;
+    return Error::success();
+  }
+
+  if (const Relocation *Reloc = FiniArraySection->getRelocationAt(0)) {
+    BC->FiniFunctionAddress = Reloc->Value;
+    return Error::success();
+  }
+
+  return createStringError(std::errc::not_supported,
+                           "No relocation for first DT_FINI_ARRAY slot");
+}
+
+void RewriteInstance::updateRtFiniReloc() {
+  if (!BC->FiniArraySection)
+    return;
+
+  const RuntimeLibrary *RT = BC->getRuntimeLibrary();
+  if (!RT || !RT->getRuntimeFiniAddress())
+    return;
+
+  if (std::optional<Relocation> Reloc =
+          BC->FiniArraySection->takeDynamicRelocationAt(0)) {
+    Reloc->Addend = RT->getRuntimeFiniAddress();
+    BC->FiniArraySection->addDynamicRelocation(*Reloc);
+    return;
+  }
+
+  // There is no dynamic relocation so we have to patch the static one. Add a
----------------
yota9 wrote:

Is there any reason to skip this in case we have a dynamic relocation? I would patch it and check that the address updated using objdump. Also if the binary uses RELR we need to patch data address too

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67348