[PATCH] D159543: [BOLT] Fix .relr section addend patching

[Vladislav Khmelevsky via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

yota9 added a comment.

Thanks @maksfb ! Yes, that is what I mean in my previous answer that first we emit the function and it's symbol and then CI and it's symbol. Also the case where we would search not by symbol directly, rather by getBinaryFunctionAtAddress, we would end up by finding CI aligned with NOP and the beginning. I would separate it, thanks!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D159543/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D159543