[PATCH] D158626: [AArch64] Add missing vrnd intrinsics

[Max Iyengar via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

miyengar added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrFormats.td:6309
+
+  def : Pat<(v1f64 (OpNode (v1f64 FPR64:$Rn))),
+           (!cast<Instruction>(NAME # Dr) FPR64:$Rn)>;
----------------
dmgreen wrote:
> I think the instructions in this multiclass are the vector variants. Can the pattern be moved to the FRIntNNT/SingleOperandFPNo16 class?
Thanks for the comment. I have tried to do this, but have run into a problem:

This pattern targets the LLVM internal intrinsic: `int_aarch64_neon_frint***_v1f64`, as referenced in `AArch64InstrInfo.td`: 

```
defm FRINT32Z : FRIntNNTVector<0, 0, "frint32z", int_aarch64_neon_frint32z>;
```
It pattern matches 'v1f64' to 'Dr', which corresponds to a scalar instruction defined in FRIntNNT/SingleOperandFPNo16 - I.e. it is matching the vector variant to the scalar variant.

Moving the pattern to FRIntNNT results in an error "Cannot select: intrinsic %llvm.aarch64.neon.frint64x" as FRIntNNT is designed to match the intrinsics whose name does not contain "neon". Since the current patch deals specifically with the neon variant, I don't see an uncomplicated way to modify FRIntNNT to accommodate both variants of such intrinsic (neon and vanilla).

I have moved the pattern from SIMDTwoVectorSD to FRIntNNTVector though which is hopefully a better place to put it.

Does this seem like a sensible solution? Thanks!


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D158626/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D158626