[PATCH] D159162: [llvm] Add assembly syntax highlighting
Jon Roelofs via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 5 08:34:24 PDT 2023
jroelofs added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/include/llvm/MC/MCInstPrinter.h:100
+ public:
+ WithMarkup(raw_ostream &OS, Markup M, bool EnableMarkup, bool EnableColor);
+ ~WithMarkup();
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
> danilaml wrote:
> > danilaml wrote:
> > > jroelofs wrote:
> > > > maybe this should be `[[nodiscard]]`
> > > `[[nodiscard]]` on constructors is a C++20 feature, even though it works on older compilers (like gcc 7.4 we claim to support), it still produces an annoying (especially if you compile with -Werror) warning. Just wanted to mention.
> > Correction - it's a DR against C++17 so it's retroactively added there, but doesn't change the fact that older compilers may still produce warnings.
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/48987fb8cc844667c6ee2a315140cb8f3d817fc1 removes it, just because it's blocking some downstream stuff we have.
>
> I do see the logic in having it so we don't forget to colour things but not sure how to do that in a compatible way right now.
We could do the macro back-compat thing:
```
// [[nodiscard]] on constructors is a C++20 feature...
#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
# define LLVM_CTOR_NODISCARD [[nodiscard]]
#else
# define LLVM_CTOR_NODISCARD
#endif
```
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D159162/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D159162
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list