[PATCH] D157070: [C++20] [Coroutines] Introduce `@llvm.coro.opt.blocker` to block the may-be-incorrect optimization for awaiter
Chuanqi Xu via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Aug 3 23:14:58 PDT 2023
ChuanqiXu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCoroutine.cpp:158-169
+ assert(Result && "Why can't we find the record type from the common "
+ "expression of a coroutine suspend expression? "
+ "Maybe we missed some types or the Sema get something "
+ "incorrect");
+
+ // In a release build without assertions enabled, return false directly
+ // to give users better user experience. It doesn't matter with the
----------------
Note that the may cause a crash if there are some types we are not able to covered. This is intentional. Since such crash is easy to fix by adding new type to the TypeVisitor. I guess this may be understandable since the type system of clang frontend (or should I say C++?) is really complex.
Also note that this only matters with people who enabled assertions, possibly developers or testers.
For end users who use a clean release build, it is completely OK to not match the type. They **may** only need to pay 1 byte memory overhead. I feel this is better for the user experience.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157070/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157070
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list