[PATCH] D154598: [CodeGen] Fix incorrectly detected reduction bug in ComplexDeinterleaving pass
mgabka via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 6 05:28:53 PDT 2023
mgabka added a comment.
Could you improve commit message description as well?
================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/complex-deinterleaving-reductions.ll:241
+; The reduced bug from D153355. Shows that reduction was detected where it did not exist.
+define void @bug(i1 %exitcond.not) #0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: bug:
----------------
there is no attribute like that, I guess it can be removed, or if attribute was relevant for this test it needs to be added
================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/complex-deinterleaving-reductions.ll:241
+; The reduced bug from D153355. Shows that reduction was detected where it did not exist.
+define void @bug(i1 %exitcond.not) #0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: bug:
----------------
mgabka wrote:
> there is no attribute like that, I guess it can be removed, or if attribute was relevant for this test it needs to be added
I have a general comment about this test, to me looks like it can be simplified and do not use the aarch64 specific intrinsics, isn't it the case that we have only fadd here but no load/store instructions?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D154598/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D154598
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list