[PATCH] D153096: [MC] Fold A-B when A's fragment precedes B's fragment

Nick Desaulniers via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 22 11:50:10 PDT 2023


nickdesaulniers accepted this revision.
nickdesaulniers added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Please fix the last indentation.



================
Comment at: llvm/test/MC/ARM/directive-if-subtraction.s:23
+// OBJ-NOT:[[@LINE-1]]:5: error: expected absolute expression
+// ASM:[[@LINE-2]]:5: error: expected absolute expression
+// DISASM: orr	r1, r1, #2
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> nickdesaulniers wrote:
> > I thought the whole point of this patch is to allow `9997b - . == 0` to fold? Then why is this testing for that to emit an error?
> This test complements the previous test that we still have `// ASM:[[@LINE-2]]:5: error: expected absolute expression`.
> 
> This is related to a larger issue that for now we use `MCAsmStreamer::getAssemblerPtr` that returns null (related to D45164). I have found that improving this would be challenging.
I see; the run lines are super perplexing to me; changing the output type from obj (to whatever the implicit default is, another .s file perhaps?) causes the assembler to error? WEIRD


================
Comment at: llvm/test/MC/MachO/reloc-diff.s:4
 _local_def:
+.p2align 2
         .globl _external_def
----------------
nickdesaulniers wrote:
> indent
This was marked done but does not look fixed to me, please triple check.  Later directives are indented. Please indent this one to be consistent.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D153096/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D153096



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list