[PATCH] D153098: [AArch64] Emit fewer CFI instructions for synchronous unwind tables
Shoaib Meenai via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 18 02:29:35 PDT 2023
smeenai added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/addsub-constant-folding.ll:363
; CHECK-NEXT: sub sp, sp, #32
-; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
; CHECK-NEXT: str x30, [sp, #16] // 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
----------------
ikudrin wrote:
> MaskRay wrote:
> > ikudrin wrote:
> > > MaskRay wrote:
> > > > `.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32` move like this seems unnecessary. It degrades precision without reducing the number of CFI instructions for sync.
> > > The goal is to reduce the size of the unwind table, not just the number of CFI instructions. Having only one chunk removes `DWA_CFA_advance_loc` instructions that would otherwise be required.
> > Yes, the goal is fine. However, when the number of instructions does not change, it would be better not to degrade the precision by moving `.cfi_def_cfa_offset`...
> In this test, there is a `.cfi_offset w30, -16` instruction below. If we kept `.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32` there it was, the size of the unwind table would be bigger. Yes, only by two bytes, but still.
Those bytes do add up ... I measured this change to be a 72 KiB size reduction for the Facebook for Android app, which is quite nice.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153098/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D153098
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list