[PATCH] D149288: [X86] Introduce a large data threshold for the medium code model
Arthur Eubanks via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 25 13:23:25 PDT 2023
aeubanks added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/CodeGen/CommandFlags.cpp:168
+ cl::desc("Choose large data threshold for x86_64 medium code model"),
+ cl::init(0));
+ CGBINDOPT(LargeDataThreshold);
----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> To match GCC, we can use 65536
>
> Consider applying this to large code model as well.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-May/619695.html
changes to this value will come in a later patch, and same for making the large code model respect this value
================
Comment at: llvm/tools/llc/llc.cpp:599
Target->setCodeModel(*CM_IR);
+ if (auto LDT = codegen::getExplicitLargeDataThreshold())
+ Target->setLargeDataThreshold(*LDT);
----------------
tkoeppe wrote:
> Can we avoid the implicit check for 0 here and spell out `; LDT > 0`? Does LLVM require C++17?
yeah LLVM uses C++17
`codegen::getExplicitLargeDataThreshold` returns a `std::optional`, so we're checking if the user explicitly overrode the value, not if the value is 0. we would want to set the value to 0 if the user explicitly requested it
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D149288/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D149288
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list