[llvm] 2f3e175 - [RISCV] Add a special caes to performVFMADD_VLCombine to support the multiplicand being the same value.
Craig Topper via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 24 17:25:46 PDT 2023
Author: Craig Topper
Date: 2023-05-24T17:25:33-07:00
New Revision: 2f3e17566bcf20bf580c92693f9653df3bc4f51d
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f3e17566bcf20bf580c92693f9653df3bc4f51d
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f3e17566bcf20bf580c92693f9653df3bc4f51d.diff
LOG: [RISCV] Add a special caes to performVFMADD_VLCombine to support the multiplicand being the same value.
The one use check will fail if there are two uses in the same
instruction. Add a special case for this.
Added:
Modified:
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vfwmacc-vp.ll
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
index 8cfd48a1ef60f..03a3260515621 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -11265,7 +11265,8 @@ static SDValue performVFMADD_VLCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// TODO: Refactor to handle more complex cases similar to
// combineBinOp_VLToVWBinOp_VL.
- if (!Op0.hasOneUse() || !Op1.hasOneUse())
+ if ((!Op0.hasOneUse() || !Op1.hasOneUse()) &&
+ (Op0 != Op1 || !Op0->hasNUsesOfValue(2, 0)))
return SDValue();
// Check the mask and VL are the same.
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vfwmacc-vp.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vfwmacc-vp.ll
index 5622046db7694..9586f62b4d352 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vfwmacc-vp.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vfwmacc-vp.ll
@@ -754,3 +754,29 @@ define <vscale x 8 x double> @vfmacc_vv_nxv8f64_nxv8f16_unmasked(<vscale x 8 x h
%v = call <vscale x 8 x double> @llvm.vp.fma.nxv8f64(<vscale x 8 x double> %aext, <vscale x 8 x double> %bext, <vscale x 8 x double> %c, <vscale x 8 x i1> %allones, i32 %evl)
ret <vscale x 8 x double> %v
}
+
+define <vscale x 1 x float> @vfmacc_squared_nxv1f32(<vscale x 1 x half> %a, <vscale x 1 x half> %b, <vscale x 1 x float> %c, <vscale x 1 x i1> %m, i32 zeroext %evl) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: vfmacc_squared_nxv1f32:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, a0, e16, mf4, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vfwmacc.vv v10, v8, v8, v0.t
+; CHECK-NEXT: vmv1r.v v8, v10
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %aext = call <vscale x 1 x float> @llvm.vp.fpext.nxv1f32.nxv1f16(<vscale x 1 x half> %a, <vscale x 1 x i1> %m, i32 %evl)
+ %v = call <vscale x 1 x float> @llvm.vp.fma.nxv1f32(<vscale x 1 x float> %aext, <vscale x 1 x float> %aext, <vscale x 1 x float> %c, <vscale x 1 x i1> %m, i32 %evl)
+ ret <vscale x 1 x float> %v
+}
+
+define <vscale x 1 x float> @vfmacc_squared_nxv1f32_unmasked(<vscale x 1 x half> %a, <vscale x 1 x half> %b, <vscale x 1 x float> %c, i32 zeroext %evl) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: vfmacc_squared_nxv1f32_unmasked:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0:
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, a0, e16, mf4, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT: vfwmacc.vv v10, v8, v8
+; CHECK-NEXT: vmv1r.v v8, v10
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+ %splat = insertelement <vscale x 1 x i1> poison, i1 -1, i32 0
+ %allones = shufflevector <vscale x 1 x i1> %splat, <vscale x 1 x i1> poison, <vscale x 1 x i32> zeroinitializer
+ %aext = call <vscale x 1 x float> @llvm.vp.fpext.nxv1f32.nxv1f16(<vscale x 1 x half> %a, <vscale x 1 x i1> %allones, i32 %evl)
+ %v = call <vscale x 1 x float> @llvm.vp.fma.nxv1f32(<vscale x 1 x float> %aext, <vscale x 1 x float> %aext, <vscale x 1 x float> %c, <vscale x 1 x i1> %allones, i32 %evl)
+ ret <vscale x 1 x float> %v
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list