[PATCH] D145572: [llvm][Uniformity] consistently handle uniform instructions
Ruiling, Song via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 8 23:14:35 PST 2023
ruiling added a comment.
In D145572#4180384 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D145572#4180384>, @sameerds wrote:
> In D145572#4180375 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D145572#4180375>, @ruiling wrote:
>
>> In D145572#4178109 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D145572#4178109>, @ronlieb wrote:
>>
>>> LGTM, as this resolves our downstream assertions seen in our CI
>>
>> Why would this fix an assertion? The description sounds like this is just an improvement. I think we need a reproducer for the assertion.
>
> Please see the comment regarding pushUsers().
Thanks for the point. Another question is does this affect a value defined in a divergent loop but used outside the loop case? For that situation, we still have to say the value is divergent.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145572/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D145572
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list