[PATCH] D144321: [PowerPC] Correctly use ELFv2 ABI on all OS's that use the ELFv2 ABI
Brad Smith via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Feb 18 17:15:56 PST 2023
brad marked 2 inline comments as done.
brad added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Targets/PPC.h:432
+ Triple.getOSMajorVersion() >= 13)) || Triple.isOSOpenBSD() ||
+ Triple.isMusl())
+ ABI = "elfv2";
----------------
dim wrote:
> clang-format seems to want to format the `if` as:
>
> ```
> if ((Triple.isOSFreeBSD() && (Triple.getOSVersion().empty() ||
> Triple.getOSMajorVersion() >= 13)) ||
> Triple.isOSOpenBSD() || Triple.isMusl())
> ```
>
> E,g. it groups the whole FreeBSD expression together. I didn't know it could do this, but it seems relatively clear.
> clang-format seems to want to format the `if` as:
>
> ```
> if ((Triple.isOSFreeBSD() && (Triple.getOSVersion().empty() ||
> Triple.getOSMajorVersion() >= 13)) ||
> Triple.isOSOpenBSD() || Triple.isMusl())
> ```
>
> E,g. it groups the whole FreeBSD expression together. I didn't know it could do this, but it seems relatively clear.
I can see both ways of doing things. I try to keep it as compact as possible. But I'll go with the suggested format.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144321/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144321
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list