[PATCH] D125133: [riscv] Fix state tracking bug on vsetvli (phi of vsetvli) peephole
Philip Reames via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 9 06:22:09 PDT 2022
This revision was landed with ongoing or failed builds.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rG7ed16e7c510a: [riscv] Fix state tracking bug on vsetvli (phi of vsetvli) peephole (authored by reames).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125133?vs=427746&id=428061#toc
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125133/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125133
Files:
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp
llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vsetvli-insert-crossbb.ll
Index: llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vsetvli-insert-crossbb.ll
===================================================================
--- llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vsetvli-insert-crossbb.ll
+++ llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/vsetvli-insert-crossbb.ll
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@
; CHECK-NEXT: vle32.v v16, (a2)
; CHECK-NEXT: slli a4, a3, 2
; CHECK-NEXT: add a1, a1, a4
-; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, a3, e32, m8, tu, mu
+; CHECK-NEXT: vsetvli zero, zero, e32, m8, tu, mu
; CHECK-NEXT: vfmacc.vf v16, fa0, v8
; CHECK-NEXT: vse32.v v16, (a2)
; CHECK-NEXT: sub a0, a0, a3
Index: llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp
===================================================================
--- llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp
+++ llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVInsertVSETVLI.cpp
@@ -1124,9 +1124,16 @@
// use the predecessor information.
assert(BlockInfo[MBB.getNumber()].Pred.isValid() &&
"Expected a valid predecessor state.");
- if (needVSETVLI(NewInfo, BlockInfo[MBB.getNumber()].Pred) &&
- needVSETVLIPHI(NewInfo, MBB)) {
- insertVSETVLI(MBB, MI, NewInfo, BlockInfo[MBB.getNumber()].Pred);
+ if (needVSETVLI(NewInfo, BlockInfo[MBB.getNumber()].Pred)) {
+ // If this is the first implicit state change, and the state change
+ // requested can be proven to produce the same register contents, we
+ // can skip emitting the actual state change and continue as if we
+ // had since we know the GPR result of the implicit state change
+ // wouldn't be used and VL/VTYPE registers are correct. Note that
+ // we *do* need to model the state as if it changed as while the
+ // register contents are unchanged, the abstract model can change.
+ if (needVSETVLIPHI(NewInfo, MBB))
+ insertVSETVLI(MBB, MI, NewInfo, BlockInfo[MBB.getNumber()].Pred);
CurInfo = NewInfo;
}
} else {
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D125133.428061.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1974 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20220509/24608bda/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list