[PATCH] D118024: [sanitizer_common] Use atomic builtin in sanitizer_atomic_clang.h
Rainer Orth via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 24 02:34:38 PST 2022
ro created this revision.
ro added a reviewer: vitalybuka.
ro added a project: Sanitizers.
Herald added subscribers: pengfei, cryptoad, fedor.sergeev, jyknight.
ro requested review of this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: Sanitizers.
As discussed in D118021 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118021>, `clang -m32` on Solaris/sparcv9 currently incorrectly doesn't
inline atomics on 8-byte operands, unlike `gcc`. With the workaround in that patch in place,
we're left with may undefined references to `__sync_val_compare_and_swap_8`, which
isn't provided by `libatomic`. This reference is due to the use of `__sync_val_compare_and_swap` in `sanitizer_atomic_clang.h`'s `atomic_compare_exchange_strong`.
As is already done in `scudo/standalone/atomic_helpers.h`, using `__atomic_compare_exchange` instead avoids this problem.
Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`, `amd64-pc-solaris2.11`, and `x86_64-pc-linux-gnu`.
However, there are two issues here:
- In a 2-stage build with GCC 11 as stage 1 compiler, it warns
/vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/local/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang.h:86:35: warning: invalid memory model argument to builtin [-Winvalid-memory-model]
86 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(&a->val_dont_use, cmp, &xchg, false, mo,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
87 | __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
According to [[ https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html#g_t_005f_005fatomic-Builtins | Built-in Functions for Memory Model Aware Atomic Operations ]], the `__atomic_*` builtins map runtime-variable memory order parameters to `__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST`. However, with `mo, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST`, `gcc` still warns
/vol/llvm/src/llvm-project/local/compiler-rt/lib/asan/../sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang.h:86:35: warning: failure memory model cannot be stronger than success memory model for ‘__atomic_compare_exchange’ [-Winvalid-memory-model]
86 | return __atomic_compare_exchange(&a->val_dont_use, cmp, &xchg, false, mo,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
87 | __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Only with ` __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST` the warning vanishes.
- With any of the three variants above, on Solaris/sparcv9 three tests regress with this patch:
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-sparc-Test/DenseMapCustomTest.DefaultMinRe
servedSizeTest
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-sparcv9-Test/CompactRingBuffer.int64
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-sparcv9-Test/DenseMapCustomTest.DefaultMin
ReservedSizeTest
There's no such regression on x86, though.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
https://reviews.llvm.org/D118024
Files:
compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang.h
Index: compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang.h
===================================================================
--- compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang.h
+++ compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_atomic_clang.h
@@ -74,13 +74,8 @@
inline bool atomic_compare_exchange_strong(volatile T *a, typename T::Type *cmp,
typename T::Type xchg,
memory_order mo) {
- typedef typename T::Type Type;
- Type cmpv = *cmp;
- Type prev;
- prev = __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&a->val_dont_use, cmpv, xchg);
- if (prev == cmpv) return true;
- *cmp = prev;
- return false;
+ return __atomic_compare_exchange(&a->val_dont_use, cmp, &xchg, false, mo,
+ __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
}
template<typename T>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D118024.402438.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 852 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20220124/d9f7d058/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list