[PATCH] D117689: [AArch64][SVE] Fold vselect into predicated fmul

Paul Walker via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 20 04:20:53 PST 2022


paulwalker-arm added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64SVEInstrInfo.td:501-518
+  multiclass vselect_to_pred_inst<SDPatternOperator Op, string Inst, ValueType Ty, ValueType PredTy> {
+    def : Pat<(vselect (PredTy PPR:$Pg), (Ty ZPR:$Zn), (Ty (Op (PredTy (AArch64ptrue 31)), (Ty ZPR:$Zn), (Ty ZPR:$Zm)))),
+              (!cast<Instruction>(Inst) PPR:$Pg, ZPR:$Zn, ZPR:$Zm)>;
+}
+
+  defm : vselect_to_pred_inst<AArch64fmul_p, "FMUL_ZPmZ_H", nxv8f16, nxv8i1>;
+  defm : vselect_to_pred_inst<AArch64fmul_p, "FMUL_ZPmZ_S", nxv4f32, nxv4i1>;
----------------
peterwaller-arm wrote:
> You might be able to condense it to something like this suggestion, by introducing another multiclass in InstrFormats `SVE_VSelect_3_Op_Pat`, analogous to `SVE_3_Op_Pat_SelZero`. What you have looks reasonable to me, you might want a second opinion from someone else as to whether my proposal here makes sense.
If possible I prefer the patterns to be added directly to the class that defines the instruction (i.e. sve_fp_2op_p_zds in this case)?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D117689/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D117689



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list