[PATCH] D109676: [HardwareLoops] put +1 for loop count before zero extension
Sam Parker via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 13 01:22:20 PST 2022
samparker added a comment.
As I said previously, the behaviour of the intrinsics should better defined and then this transform should adhere to those semantics. We're already using different pairs of intrinsics for each backend, so this shouldn't be a problem; however, we may have to ensure the Arm backend rejects the 'old' set.loop.iterations just to be safe.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109676/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109676
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list