[PATCH] D106237: [ISel] Port AArch64 HADD and RHADD to ISel

Craig Topper via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 5 12:31:33 PDT 2021


craig.topper added a comment.

Instead of making this part of SimplifyDemandedBits, could you emit (and (sext (hadds X, Y)), 0x7fffffff) for the (lshr (add (sext(X), sext(Y)), 1) case and let the AND be optimized by itself? Or would the transform not be profitable if it doesn't get removed?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D106237/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D106237



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list