[PATCH] D109482: [RISCV] Fold store of vmv.x.s to a vse with VL=1.

[Fraser Cormack via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

frasercrmck added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp:6596
+        SDLoc DL(N);
+        return DAG.getMemIntrinsicNode(
+            RISCVISD::VSE_VL, DL, DAG.getVTList(MVT::Other),
----------------
I was wondering what'd happen if you replaced it with a `ISD::VP_STORE`. Just thinking that a standard node would potentially provide more optimization opportunities compared to a RISCVISD node.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D109482/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D109482