[PATCH] D108903: [llvm-reduce] Add reduce operands pass
Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 7 15:01:45 PDT 2021
lebedev.ri added a comment.
In D108903#2988032 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108903#2988032>, @aeubanks wrote:
> In D108903#2987942 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108903#2987942>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better to leave the question of with what to replace to a separate patch, and stick to the current consistent practice here?
>
> I don't think it matters too much if we've agreed in the thread that null is better, and we do a followup patch soon where we add a flag and consolidate what we replace things with into a helper method controlled by the flag.
But did we agree on null?
And i'm not really sure what "I don't think it matters too much" means - this either does introduce inconsistency or it does not.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108903/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D108903
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list