[PATCH] D104061: [LangRef] clarify the meaning of noimplicitfloat

[Bob Haarman via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

inglorion added a comment.

I avoided enumerating the cases to save space and to avoid pinning this down too much. My intention was to clarify that noimplicitfloat does not mean that no floating-point code will be generated under any circumstances, not necessarily to clarify exactly in which situations such code will or will not be generated. I'm happy to add the extra text, but before I do, I would like to get a second vote in favor of doing so vs. using the shorter text that I had written. @rnk, @craig.topper: What are your opinions?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104061/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104061