[PATCH] D100721: [SCEVExpander] Try to create ASHR instr for expanded SCEV expr.

[Dávid Bolvanský via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

xbolva00 added a comment.

>> Again, i never said that. I only said that they mostly only reiterate the last point made, but not frequently make a new point.

Sorry, but.... is it wrong? Am I breaking some community rules? If so, tell me, if not, then ... :)

Is it bad to respond on new comments or new patch revisions? No, I consider it OK. I comment what I want. I can ask (nobody is obligatory to answer me), I can request some change in a patch and also it is fine to thank if my feedback was addressed. I can send one patch per day and also I can send one patch per year - OK too. We do (and some of us in our free time) what we can to improve this project.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D100721/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D100721