[llvm] 8d20f2c - Revert "[CodeGenPrepare] Fix isIVIncrement (PR49466)"
Eric Christopher via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 12 16:05:20 PST 2021
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:51 PM Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>
wrote:
>
> On 3/12/21 3:44 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 6:35 PM Philip Reames via llvm-commits <
> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 3/12/21 3:22 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-commits wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/12/21 2:59 PM, Jordan Rupprecht wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:29 PM Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jordan,
>>>
>>> Please revert this change.
>>>
>>> There's a couple of problems here:
>>>
>>> - The change reverted looks obviously innocent. (e.g. it's bailing
>>> out of a transform slightly more often)
>>>
>>> I don't disagree that it "looks obviously innocent", but the proof is in
>> the pudding: the reproducer I posted compiles ~instantly at one commit
>> prior, and times out at the culprit commit. A change "looking" good should
>> never be a basis for saying it must be correct and should not be reverted,
>> especially when there is evidence it is a problem. At least, that's my
>> personal opinion, but I should think that's a fairly basic and widely held
>> belief.
>>
>> You're correct, but missing the point I was getting at. Admittedly,
>> poorly worded.
>>
>> While looking obviously innocent isn't reason not to revert itself, it's
>> definitely reason to take a slightly closer look and make sure there's
>> nothing else going on. This is particularly relevant given the other
>> points in this discussion.
>>
>>
>>> - The change reverted was itself fixing a functional bug. At a
>>> minimum, we'd need a larger revert to get ToT back to a sane state.
>>>
>>> The fix is introducing a different bug, and one which seems more
>> widespread. At the very least, we haven't observed any of the crashes
>> mentioned in PR49466, but we did notice a compile timeout in several
>> different compilation units.
>>
>> Bug? Discussion? Response to original commit?
>>
>> Your observation may be true *for you*. It is not necessarily true for
>> anyone else, and you bear the burden of making the case. Particularly when
>> reverting a functional fix.
>>
>> To be clear, I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying you haven't given
>> anyone else enough information to tell if you are or not.
>>
>>
>>> - It is generally considered reasonable to provide a test case and
>>> wait a bit before reverting, at least once the patch is more than a few
>>> hours old.
>>>
>>> Sorry about that. I'll concede that I got a little trigger happy here,
>> but I was hoping that would be waived by the fact that I gave a simple,
>> concrete reproducer.
>>
>> Thanks for the acknowledgement. To be fair, it would have been less of
>> an issue if the reproducer worked straight forwardly.
>>
>>
>>> - Failure to provide an IR test case.
>>>
>>> (ditto, but see one below)
>>
>>>
>>> - Your test case does not reproduce. Or at least, it doesn't
>>> reproduce when compiled with clang10 to IR and then run through (very
>>> recent, but without your change) ToT opt -O2. If there's something
>>> specific about the interaction of clang and opt ToT, reducing this down to
>>> a IR test case becomes particularly important.
>>>
>>> This comment is going *way* off track -- the reproducer I posted *does*
>> reproduce, at least for me, in the configuration I posted (a C++ source
>> file, and just "clang -O2"). By saying it doesn't reproduce in a mixed
>> configuration of an old version of clang to do the C++ -> IR combined with
>> a ToT version of opt -O2 to do the IR -> object file is misleading -- it's
>> true, but that's not at all what I was claiming, and I don't know where
>> it's coming from.
>>
>> I actually don't think this is going off track at all. Our default is
>> for IR test cases for IR problems. Any reverting commit should generally
>> include a test case suitable for checkin (w/a bit of cleanup) once the
>> patch is fixed. I'll admit, we're not strict about this, but the
>> expectation is definitely there.
>>
>> The discussion of the hybrid configuration is relevant *because* you
>> didn't provide a test case in a form I could easily use. I don't work on
>> clang, don't build it regularly, and shouldn't have to investigate a LLVM
>> codegen regression.
>>
>> (See also below.)
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Philip
>>>
>>> p.s. To be clear, I'm happy to look at your original issue this
>>> afternoon if you've got something I can reproduce.
>>>
>> Here's an IR reproducer with IR generated from ToT before my revert (at
>> dfd27ebbd0eb137c9a439b7c537bb87ba903efd3):
>>
>> Ok, we have a problem here. None of the following reproduce for me:
>>
>> $ ./llc -O2 jordan.ll
>> $ ./llc -O2 jordan.ll
>> $ ./llc -O2 jordan.ll --filetype=obj
>> $ ./llc -O3 jordan.ll --filetype=obj
>>
>> LLC is ToT, just built with your change reverted locally.
>>
>> $ bin/clang -c /tmp/repro.cc -O1 -S -emit-llvm -o /tmp/repro.ll
>> $ bin/clang -c /tmp/repro.ll -O2 -o /tmp/repro.o # hangs
>>
>> Given the preceding, I am now asserting this is likely some clang
>> specific problem. I've got a build of clang running now, will report back
>> in a bit.
>>
>> With a newly build clang, I can reproduce what you're seeing. However,
>> no attempt to mine to get IR out clang - I'm no expert here - has generated
>> anything standalone reproducible in IR.
>>
>> Looking at debug output does make it look the transform affected by the
>> revert is involved in the infinite loop, but I *strongly* suspect the
>> actual revert is just massaging the issue enough to avoid something lurking.
>>
>> I will spend some time this afternoon investigating this.
>>
>> I would strongly suggest you follow up with clang folks to figure out why
>> clang and llc are not matching behavior. That's a serious problem.
>>
>
> To add context here: This has never been the case due to how clang will
> run the pass manager and code generation versus a base llc run. I agree
> that it would be nice, but it's never been a priority for anyone :)
>
> Two points:
>
> 1) Not matching in practice and not matching in theory are two different
> states. If our practical behavior has changed, that's a problem.
>
>
Practical and theory have unfortunately never matched - especially with
loop optimizations. There's an unfortunate amount of PM configuration where
the default is not necessarily the default in clang because of various
reasons. I'm happy to chat about some of the how and when to fix it and we
do fix it on occasion (see me fixing similar things last year).
> 2) I'm not a clang dev. I don't want to be a clang dev. If clang devs
> want to shoot themselves in the foot, that's their choice. Thus, my
> insistence on IR test cases.
>
>
> I think then the words you were looking for were "I'm having trouble
working up an llc or opt reproducer, would you mind helping me through
this?" We're not doing things any differently than (as has been said)
happens every day on the lists. Happens to us all and there's always
frustration, I hope this helps and if there's anything I can do let me know.
Thanks!
-eric
> -eric
>
>> The other option is that this is someway specific to your configuration.
>>
>>
>>
>> ; ModuleID = '/tmp/repro.cc'
>> source_filename = "/tmp/repro.cc"
>> target datalayout =
>> "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
>> target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
>>
>> %class.D = type { i64 }
>> %class.a = type { %class.g }
>> %class.g = type { i32*, i32* }
>>
>> $_ZNK1aIliEixEl = comdat any
>>
>> $_ZNK1aIliE1jEv = comdat any
>>
>> @o = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i32 0, align 4
>> @p = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i32 0, align 4
>> @.str = private unnamed_addr constant [1 x i8] zeroinitializer, align 1
>>
>> ; Function Attrs: uwtable mustprogress
>> define dso_local void @_ZN1D1qERK1aIliE(%class.D* nocapture nonnull
>> dereferenceable(8) %0, %class.a* nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(16) %1)
>> local_unnamed_addr #0 align 2 {
>> %3 = call i64 @_ZNK1aIliEixEl(%class.a* nonnull dereferenceable(16) %1,
>> i64 0) #3
>> %4 = icmp eq i64 %3, 0
>> br i1 %4, label %26, label %5
>>
>> 5: ; preds = %2
>> %6 = call i64 @_ZNK1aIliE1jEv(%class.a* nonnull dereferenceable(16) %1)
>> %7 = icmp eq i64 %6, 0
>> br i1 %7, label %26, label %8
>>
>> 8: ; preds = %5
>> %9 = getelementptr inbounds %class.D, %class.D* %0, i64 0, i32 0
>> br label %10
>>
>> 10: ; preds = %8, %18
>> %11 = phi i64 [ 0, %8 ], [ %23, %18 ]
>> %12 = call i64 @_ZNK1aIliEixEl(%class.a* nonnull dereferenceable(16)
>> %1, i64 %11) #3
>> %13 = icmp eq i64 %12, 0
>> br i1 %13, label %18, label %14
>>
>> 14: ; preds = %10, %14
>> %15 = load i32, i32* @o, align 4, !tbaa !2
>> %16 = call i32 @_Z3fn1IiiEiT_T0_PKc(i32 %15, i32 0, i8* getelementptr
>> inbounds ([1 x i8], [1 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64 0))
>> %17 = icmp eq i32 %16, 0
>> br i1 %17, label %18, label %14, !llvm.loop !6
>>
>> 18: ; preds = %14, %10
>> %19 = call i64 @_ZNK1aIliEixEl(%class.a* nonnull dereferenceable(16)
>> %1, i64 %11) #3
>> %20 = load i32, i32* @p, align 4, !tbaa !2
>> %21 = sext i32 %20 to i64
>> %22 = sdiv i64 %19, %21
>> store i64 %22, i64* %9, align 8, !tbaa !9
>> %23 = add i64 %11, 1
>> %24 = call i64 @_ZNK1aIliE1jEv(%class.a* nonnull dereferenceable(16) %1)
>> %25 = icmp eq i64 %24, 0
>> br i1 %25, label %26, label %10, !llvm.loop !12
>>
>> 26: ; preds = %18, %5, %2
>> ret void
>> }
>>
>> ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable willreturn mustprogress
>> define linkonce_odr dso_local i64 @_ZNK1aIliEixEl(%class.a* nonnull
>> dereferenceable(16) %0, i64 %1) local_unnamed_addr #1 comdat align 2 {
>> %3 = getelementptr inbounds %class.a, %class.a* %0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0
>> %4 = load i32*, i32** %3, align 8, !tbaa !13
>> %5 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %4, i64 %1
>> %6 = load i32, i32* %5, align 4, !tbaa !2
>> %7 = sext i32 %6 to i64
>> ret i64 %7
>> }
>>
>> ; Function Attrs: nounwind uwtable willreturn mustprogress
>> define linkonce_odr dso_local i64 @_ZNK1aIliE1jEv(%class.a* nonnull
>> dereferenceable(16) %0) local_unnamed_addr #1 comdat align 2 {
>> %2 = getelementptr inbounds %class.a, %class.a* %0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 1
>> %3 = load i32*, i32** %2, align 8, !tbaa !16
>> %4 = getelementptr inbounds %class.a, %class.a* %0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0
>> %5 = load i32*, i32** %4, align 8, !tbaa !13
>> %6 = ptrtoint i32* %3 to i64
>> %7 = ptrtoint i32* %5 to i64
>> %8 = sub i64 %6, %7
>> %9 = ashr exact i64 %8, 2
>> ret i64 %9
>> }
>>
>> declare dso_local i32 @_Z3fn1IiiEiT_T0_PKc(i32, i32, i8*)
>> local_unnamed_addr #2
>>
>> attributes #0 = { uwtable mustprogress "frame-pointer"="none"
>> "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8"
>> "target-cpu"="x86-64" "target-features"="+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87"
>> "tune-cpu"="generic" }
>> attributes #1 = { nounwind uwtable willreturn mustprogress
>> "frame-pointer"="none" "no-trapping-math"="true"
>> "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="x86-64"
>> "target-features"="+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87" "tune-cpu"="generic" }
>> attributes #2 = { "frame-pointer"="none" "no-trapping-math"="true"
>> "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="x86-64"
>> "target-features"="+cx8,+fxsr,+mmx,+sse,+sse2,+x87" "tune-cpu"="generic" }
>> attributes #3 = { nounwind }
>>
>> !llvm.module.flags = !{!0}
>> !llvm.ident = !{!1}
>>
>> !0 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4}
>> !1 = !{!"clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git
>> dfd27ebbd0eb137c9a439b7c537bb87ba903efd3)"}
>> !2 = !{!3, !3, i64 0}
>> !3 = !{!"int", !4, i64 0}
>> !4 = !{!"omnipotent char", !5, i64 0}
>> !5 = !{!"Simple C++ TBAA"}
>> !6 = distinct !{!6, !7, !8}
>> !7 = !{!"llvm.loop.mustprogress"}
>> !8 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll.disable"}
>> !9 = !{!10, !11, i64 0}
>> !10 = !{!"_ZTS1D", !11, i64 0}
>> !11 = !{!"long", !4, i64 0}
>> !12 = distinct !{!12, !7, !8}
>> !13 = !{!14, !15, i64 0}
>> !14 = !{!"_ZTS1g", !15, i64 0, !15, i64 8}
>> !15 = !{!"any pointer", !4, i64 0}
>> !16 = !{!14, !15, i64 8}
>>
>>
>>> On 3/12/21 1:59 PM, Jordan Rupprecht via llvm-commits wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: Jordan Rupprecht
>>> Date: 2021-03-12T13:59:14-08:00
>>> New Revision: 8d20f2c2c66eb486ff23cc3d55a53bd840b36971
>>>
>>> URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d20f2c2c66eb486ff23cc3d55a53bd840b36971
>>> DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8d20f2c2c66eb486ff23cc3d55a53bd840b36971.diff
>>>
>>> LOG: Revert "[CodeGenPrepare] Fix isIVIncrement (PR49466)"
>>>
>>> This reverts commit cf82700af8c658ae09b14c3d01bb1e73e48d3bd3 due to a compile timeout when building the following with `clang -O2`:
>>>
>>> ```
>>> template <class, class = int> class a;
>>> struct b {
>>> using d = int *;
>>> };
>>> struct e {
>>> using f = b::d;
>>> };
>>> class g {
>>> public:
>>> e::f h;
>>> e::f i;
>>> };
>>> template <class, class> class a : g {
>>> public:
>>> long j() const { return i - h; }
>>> long operator[](long) const noexcept;
>>> };
>>> template <class c, class k> long a<c, k>::operator[](long l) const noexcept {
>>> return h[l];
>>> }
>>> template <typename m, typename n> int fn1(m, n, const char *);
>>> int o, p;
>>> class D {
>>> void q(const a<long> &);
>>> long r;
>>> };
>>> void D::q(const a<long> &l) {
>>> int s;
>>> if (l[0])
>>> for (; l.j(); ++s) {
>>> if (l[s])
>>> while (fn1(o, 0, ""))
>>> ;
>>> r = l[s] / p;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Added:
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> llvm/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
>>>
>>> Removed:
>>> llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr49466.ll
>>>
>>>
>>> ################################################################################
>>> diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
>>> index 0f698dd3b190..0b1156e2ace7 100644
>>> --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
>>> +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
>>> @@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ getIVIncrement(const PHINode *PN, const LoopInfo *LI) {
>>>
>>> static bool isIVIncrement(const BinaryOperator *BO, const LoopInfo *LI) {
>>> auto *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BO->getOperand(0));
>>> - if (!PN || LI->getLoopFor(BO->getParent()) != LI->getLoopFor(PN->getParent()))
>>> + if (!PN)
>>> return false;
>>> if (auto IVInc = getIVIncrement(PN, LI))
>>> return IVInc->first == BO;
>>> @@ -1347,7 +1347,6 @@ bool CodeGenPrepare::replaceMathCmpWithIntrinsic(BinaryOperator *BO,
>>> if (!isIVIncrement(BO, LI))
>>> return false;
>>> const Loop *L = LI->getLoopFor(BO->getParent());
>>> - assert(L && "L should not be null after isIVIncrement()");
>>> // Do not risk on moving increment into a child loop.
>>> if (LI->getLoopFor(Cmp->getParent()) != L)
>>> return false;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr49466.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr49466.ll
>>> deleted file mode 100644
>>> index 4f6574d9bbf2..000000000000
>>> --- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/pr49466.ll
>>> +++ /dev/null
>>> @@ -1,122 +0,0 @@
>>> -; RUN: opt < %s -O2 -codegenprepare -S | FileCheck %s
>>> -
>>> -target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
>>> -target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
>>> -
>>> - at b = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i64 0, align 8
>>> - at c = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i64 0, align 8
>>> - at d = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i64 0, align 8
>>> - at e = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i64 0, align 8
>>> - at f = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i64 0, align 8
>>> - at g = dso_local local_unnamed_addr global i64 0, align 8
>>> -
>>> -; CHECK-LABEL: @m(
>>> -
>>> -define dso_local i32 @m() local_unnamed_addr {
>>> -entry:
>>> - %0 = load i64, i64* @f, align 8
>>> - %1 = inttoptr i64 %0 to i32*
>>> - %2 = load i64, i64* @c, align 8
>>> - %conv18 = trunc i64 %2 to i32
>>> - %cmp = icmp slt i32 %conv18, 3
>>> - %3 = load i64, i64* @d, align 8
>>> - %conv43 = trunc i64 %3 to i8
>>> - %tobool40.not = icmp eq i8 %conv43, 0
>>> - br label %for.cond
>>> -
>>> -for.cond: ; preds = %for.cond39.preheader, %entry
>>> - %j.0 = phi i32 [ undef, %entry ], [ %j.1.lcssa, %for.cond39.preheader ]
>>> - %p.0 = phi i64 [ undef, %entry ], [ %p.1.lcssa, %for.cond39.preheader ]
>>> - %i.0 = phi i32 [ undef, %entry ], [ %i.1.lcssa, %for.cond39.preheader ]
>>> - %cmp73 = icmp slt i32 %i.0, 3
>>> - br i1 %cmp73, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.cond39.preheader
>>> -
>>> -for.body.preheader: ; preds = %for.cond
>>> - br label %for.body
>>> -
>>> -for.cond1.loopexit: ; preds = %for.inc34.preheader, %for.end12
>>> - br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond39.preheader.loopexit
>>> -
>>> -for.cond39.preheader.loopexit: ; preds = %for.cond1.loopexit
>>> - br label %for.cond39.preheader
>>> -
>>> -for.cond39.preheader: ; preds = %for.cond39.preheader.loopexit, %for.cond
>>> - %j.1.lcssa = phi i32 [ %j.0, %for.cond ], [ %conv18, %for.cond39.preheader.loopexit ]
>>> - %p.1.lcssa = phi i64 [ %p.0, %for.cond ], [ 0, %for.cond39.preheader.loopexit ]
>>> - %i.1.lcssa = phi i32 [ %i.0, %for.cond ], [ %conv18, %for.cond39.preheader.loopexit ]
>>> - br i1 %tobool40.not, label %for.cond, label %for.inc42.preheader
>>> -
>>> -for.inc42.preheader: ; preds = %for.cond39.preheader
>>> - br label %for.inc42
>>> -
>>> -for.body: ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.cond1.loopexit
>>> - %l.176 = phi i8 [ %sub, %for.cond1.loopexit ], [ 0, %for.body.preheader ]
>>> - %p.175 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.cond1.loopexit ], [ %p.0, %for.body.preheader ]
>>> - %j.174 = phi i32 [ %conv18, %for.cond1.loopexit ], [ %j.0, %for.body.preheader ]
>>> - %tobool.not = icmp eq i32 %j.174, 0
>>> - br i1 %tobool.not, label %cleanup45, label %for.cond2.preheader
>>> -
>>> -for.cond2.preheader: ; preds = %for.body
>>> - %tobool3.not69 = icmp eq i64 %p.175, 0
>>> - %.pr.pre = load i64, i64* @e, align 8
>>> - br i1 %tobool3.not69, label %for.end12, label %for.body4.preheader
>>> -
>>> -for.body4.preheader: ; preds = %for.cond2.preheader
>>> - %4 = sub i64 0, %p.175
>>> - %xtraiter = and i64 %4, 7
>>> - %lcmp.mod.not = icmp eq i64 %xtraiter, 0
>>> - br i1 %lcmp.mod.not, label %for.body4.prol.loopexit, label %for.body4.prol.preheader
>>> -
>>> -for.body4.prol.preheader: ; preds = %for.body4.preheader
>>> - %5 = mul nsw i64 %xtraiter, -1
>>> - br label %for.body4.prol
>>> -
>>> -for.body4.prol: ; preds = %for.body4.prol.preheader, %for.body4.prol
>>> - %lsr.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body4.prol.preheader ], [ %lsr.iv.next, %for.body4.prol ]
>>> - %lsr.iv.next = add nsw i64 %lsr.iv, -1
>>> - %prol.iter.cmp.not = icmp eq i64 %5, %lsr.iv.next
>>> - br i1 %prol.iter.cmp.not, label %for.body4.prol.loopexit.loopexit, label %for.body4.prol
>>> -
>>> -for.body4.prol.loopexit.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body4.prol
>>> - %6 = sub i64 %p.175, %lsr.iv.next
>>> - br label %for.body4.prol.loopexit
>>> -
>>> -for.body4.prol.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body4.prol.loopexit.loopexit, %for.body4.preheader
>>> - %p.270.unr = phi i64 [ %p.175, %for.body4.preheader ], [ %6, %for.body4.prol.loopexit.loopexit ]
>>> - %7 = icmp ugt i64 %p.175, -8
>>> - br i1 %7, label %for.end12, label %for.body4.preheader89
>>> -
>>> -for.body4.preheader89: ; preds = %for.body4.prol.loopexit
>>> - br label %for.body4
>>> -
>>> -for.body4: ; preds = %for.body4.preheader89, %for.body4
>>> - %p.270 = phi i64 [ %inc11.7, %for.body4 ], [ %p.270.unr, %for.body4.preheader89 ]
>>> - %inc11.7 = add i64 %p.270, 8
>>> - %tobool3.not.7 = icmp eq i64 %inc11.7, 0
>>> - br i1 %tobool3.not.7, label %for.end12.loopexit, label %for.body4
>>> -
>>> -for.end12.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body4
>>> - br label %for.end12
>>> -
>>> -for.end12: ; preds = %for.end12.loopexit, %for.body4.prol.loopexit, %for.cond2.preheader
>>> - %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4
>>> - %conv23 = zext i32 %8 to i64
>>> - %9 = load i64, i64* @b, align 8
>>> - %div24 = udiv i64 %9, %conv23
>>> - store i64 %div24, i64* @b, align 8
>>> - %sub = add i8 %l.176, -1
>>> - %tobool32.not72 = icmp eq i64 %.pr.pre, 0
>>> - br i1 %tobool32.not72, label %for.cond1.loopexit, label %for.inc34.preheader
>>> -
>>> -for.inc34.preheader: ; preds = %for.end12
>>> - store i64 0, i64* @e, align 8
>>> - br label %for.cond1.loopexit
>>> -
>>> -for.inc42: ; preds = %for.inc42.preheader, %for.inc42
>>> - br label %for.inc42
>>> -
>>> -cleanup45: ; preds = %for.body
>>> - %cmp13 = icmp ne i8 %l.176, 0
>>> - %conv16 = zext i1 %cmp13 to i32
>>> - ret i32 %conv16
>>> -}
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing listllvm-commits at lists.llvm.orghttps://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing listllvm-commits at lists.llvm.orghttps://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210312/4b28cf83/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list