[PATCH] D98157: [NFC][AMDGPU] Correct typo in DWARF Extensions For Heterogeneous Debugging

[Tony Tye via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

t-tye created this revision.
t-tye added reviewers: scott.linder, zoran.zaric.
Herald added subscribers: kerbowa, tpr, dstuttard, yaxunl, nhaehnle, jvesely, kzhuravl.
t-tye requested review of this revision.
Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, wdng.
Herald added a project: LLVM.

A note in the defintion of DW_OP_piece had an incomplete sentence.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D98157

Files:
  llvm/docs/AMDGPUDwarfExtensionsForHeterogeneousDebugging.rst


Index: llvm/docs/AMDGPUDwarfExtensionsForHeterogeneousDebugging.rst
===================================================================
--- llvm/docs/AMDGPUDwarfExtensionsForHeterogeneousDebugging.rst
+++ llvm/docs/AMDGPUDwarfExtensionsForHeterogeneousDebugging.rst
@@ -2390,13 +2390,13 @@
     .. note::
 
       Since these extensions allow location descriptions to be entries on the
-      stack, a simpler operation to create composite location descriptions. For
-      example, just one operation that specifies how many parts, and pops pairs
-      of stack entries for the part size and location description. Not only
-      would this be a simpler operation and avoid the complexities of incomplete
-      composite location descriptions, but it may also have a smaller encoding
-      in practice. However, the desire for compatibility with DWARF Version 5 is
-      likely a stronger consideration.
+      stack, a simpler operation to create composite location descriptions could
+      be defined. For example, just one operation that specifies how many parts,
+      and pops pairs of stack entries for the part size and location
+      description. Not only would this be a simpler operation and avoid the
+      complexities of incomplete composite location descriptions, but it may
+      also have a smaller encoding in practice. However, the desire for
+      compatibility with DWARF Version 5 is likely a stronger consideration.
 
 2.  ``DW_OP_bit_piece``
 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D98157.328907.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1478 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20210307/4a0aa5fb/attachment.bin>