[PATCH] D93811: [VE] Support llvm.eh.sjlj.lsda
Kazushi Marukawa via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jan 4 01:33:34 PST 2021
kaz7 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/VE/VEISelLowering.cpp:1550
+ const TargetLowering &TLI = DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo();
+ MVT PtrVT = TLI.getPointerTy(DAG.getDataLayout());
+ const VETargetMachine *TM =
----------------
simoll wrote:
> I suppose you could re-use the type of `Op` here
I'm not sure about it. Do you have any strategies to decide either Op.getValueType() or TLI.getPointerTy()? All other architectures use TLI.getPointerTy() to implement lsda. It's really difficult to decide it with certain reasons.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93811/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93811
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list