[PATCH] D92440: [dfsan] Support passing non-i16 shadow values in TLS mode
Matt Morehouse via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 3 13:12:19 PST 2020
morehouse added a comment.
Why do we need the 8 byte alignment at all? It seems a little silly to have gaps in the TLS shadow.
Currently, when there's 6 params we get the following TLS pattern:
`xxxxxx11xxxxxx22xxxxxx33xxxxxx44xxxxxx55xxxxxx66`
where each `x` is an unused byte.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92440/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92440
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list