[PATCH] D90772: [Coroutines] Add missing llvm.dbg.declare's to cover more allocas
Bruno Cardoso Lopes via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 9 18:18:21 PST 2020
bruno added a comment.
Hi @junparser,
> One of the another issue is that it is also necessary to track coroutine function parameters correctly under O1 <https://reviews.llvm.org/owners/package/1/>/O2 <https://reviews.llvm.org/owners/package/2/> level which use dbg.value. Thoughts?
I haven't looked up the coroutine function parameter debugging quality yet, does it even work fine for `-O0`? I'm trying to go over the issues I find for `-O0` first and incrementally improve on top of that. Any specific testcase in mind?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90772/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90772
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list