[PATCH] D89995: Make the post-commit review expectations more explicit with respect to revert

[Mehdi AMINI via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini added a comment.

In D89995#2354416 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89995#2354416>, @silvas wrote:

> my 2 cents:
>
> meta-point: this discussion should be happening on llvm-dev. it's clearly outside the scope of a patch review at this point.

I pinged the original thread on llvm-dev@, if anyone has concerns they can express them there of course.
This review is mostly about writing down the existing policy and so should focusing on the wordsmith of the text.

I agree that waiting months to get a patch in is an issue (a long lasting one!), and our lack of processes around making progress in situation where there is a lack of consensus: I'm interested in improving the situation on these topics as much as possible, but that seems orthogonal to the revert.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D89995/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D89995