[PATCH] D89142: llvmbuildectomy

[Mehdi AMINI via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mehdi_amini added a comment.

In D89142#2343278 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89142#2343278>, @Meinersbur wrote:

> LLVM's policy so far was that downstream concerns should not block upstream progress. That being said, if it's just some time needed for downstream to prepare, we could consider waiting a courtesy.

Absolutely, we don't have a hard blocker, but the timing is just a bit annoying for us as we are in the middle of the migration. Ideally if we could wait a few weeks that would be better for us (and for all the downstream project building with Bazel).

(Right now the patch hasn't been reviewed/accepted yet though?)


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D89142/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D89142