[PATCH] D83351: [llvm-reduce] Reducing attributes
Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 8 10:45:37 PDT 2020
lebedev.ri added a comment.
In D83351#2139586 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D83351#2139586>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> I'm not a fan of the inconsistent use of range-for and for-each; I would prefer range-for everywhere since it's more concise.
My (consistently inconsistent) headcanon as to which to use when is that for_each should be used
when in principle we don't care in which order each item will be processed.
> But I don't feel strongly enough to block the patch based on that. Maybe LLVM's style guide should provide clarity and guidance on the difference of opinion?
> It might be polite to see if other reviewers have additional and timely feedback.
Sure, let's see if @dblaikie / etc have any other comments.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83351/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83351
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list