[PATCH] D82034: [docs] Clarify semantics of ordered fadd reductions.

[Sanjay Patel via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

spatel added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/LangRef.rst:15135
+the operation respects the associativity of a scalarized reduction. That is, the
+order begins with the start value, and performs an fadd operation with consecutively
+increasing vector element indices. See the following pseudocode:
----------------
"That is, the operation begins with the start value and performs..." ?


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/LangRef.rst:15204-15205
 reduction will not preserve the associativity of an equivalent scalarized
 counterpart. Otherwise the reduction will be *ordered*, thus implying that
 the operation respects the associativity of a scalarized reduction.
 
----------------
Add the corresponding text/example for fmul too?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D82034/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D82034