[PATCH] D76721: Clarify use of llvm_unreachable in the coding standard

[David Blaikie via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dblaikie accepted this revision.
dblaikie added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

ah, good to see there's already some verbiage here that covers the general idea (which I'd clearly forgotten about, might've been good framing for the discussion earlier, so good to know it's here) - specifically saying "here's a better thing" but "use it" is left as an implication - the new paragraph makes that more explicit, which is good.

Thanks a bunch!


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D76721/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D76721