[PATCH] D74141: [InstCombine] Simplify a umul overflow check to a != 0 && b != 0.
Florian Hahn via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 14 06:41:43 PST 2020
fhahn added reviewers: Bigcheese, dexonsmith, aemerson.
fhahn added a comment.
(re-adding dropped reviewers)
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp:2726-2743
+ CmpInst::Predicate Pred;
+ Value *UMul1, *UMul2;
+ // Check if the OR weakens the overflow condition for umul.with.overflow by
+ // treating any non-zero result as overflow. In that case, we overflow if both
+ // umul.with.overflow operands are != 0, as in that case the result can only
+ // be 0, iff the multiplication overflows.
+ auto P = m_ICmp(Pred, m_ExtractValue<0>(m_Value(UMul2)), m_SpecificInt(0));
----------------
lebedev.ri wrote:
> lebedev.ri wrote:
> > Consider doing the following instead:
> > ```
> > // Check if the OR weakens the overflow condition for umul.with.overflow by
> > // treating any non-zero result as overflow. In that case, we overflow if both
> > // umul.with.overflow operands are != 0, as in that case the result can only
> > // be 0, iff the multiplication overflows.
> > CmpInst::Predicate Pred;
> > Value *MulWithOv;
> > if (match(&I,
> > m_c_Or(m_ICmp(Pred, m_OneUse(m_ExtractValue<0>(m_Value(MulWithOv))),
> > m_ZeroInt()),
> > m_OneUse(m_ExtractValue<1>(m_Deferred(MulWithOv))))) &&
> > Pred == CmpInst::ICMP_NE) {
> > Value *A, *B;
> > if (match(MulWithOv, m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::umul_with_overflow>(
> > m_Value(A), m_Value(B))))
> > return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(
> > Builder.CreateICmpNE(A, ConstantInt::get(A->getType(), 0)),
> > Builder.CreateICmpNE(A, ConstantInt::get(B->getType(), 0)));
> > }
> > ```
> Also, use `Builder.CreateIsNotNull()`
Nice, m_c_Or and m_Deferred are very helpful!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D74141/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D74141
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list