[PATCH] D71645: [NFC][InlineCost] Simplify internal inlining cost interface

Mircea Trofin via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 19 13:03:11 PST 2019


mtrofin added a comment.

In D71645#1791582 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71645#1791582>, @davidxl wrote:

> There is comment like this:
>
>   /// The candidate callsite being analyzed. Please do not use this to do
>   /// analysis in the caller function; we want the inline cost query to be
>   /// easily cacheable. Instead, use the cover function paramHasAttr.
>   CallBase &CandidateCall;
>   
>
> Can you find out the history of this field?


It seems it was introduced here: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9129. analyzeCall was already taking a CallSite parameter.

> On the other hand, if a different callsite is passed to analyzeCall other than CandidateCall, it will produce wrong results.

That's the thing: the API is local to this file, and there is no case when we pass a different parameter to analyzeCall, than the parameter used to construct the CallAnalyzer object.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71645/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D71645





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list