[PATCH] D69356: [NFC] Rename LLVM_NO_DEAD_STRIP

[Hubert Tong via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment.

In D69356#1726121 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69356#1726121>, @lhames wrote:

> In D69356#1726074 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69356#1726074>, @beanz wrote:
>
> > ... It seems to me that maybe a more appropriate approach is that `LLVM_SUPPORT_PLUGINS` implies `LLVM_NO_DEAD_STRIP`, rather than conflating the two options.
>
>
> Yep — there are use-cases for no-dead-strip that aren’t plugins. I’m not sure this rename helps. I think the .*PLUGINS.* options need more consideration, and that LLVM_NO_DEAD_STRIP should be reinstated.


Is there some documentation indicating these other use cases? The current instances are consistent with plug-in support. The "no dead strip" semantic is wrong and harmful for plug-in support on some platforms, so the suggestion to imply "no dead strip" when plug-in support is requested might not be advisable.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69356/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69356