[PATCH] D68103: [InstCombine] Simplify shift-by-sext to shift-by-zext
Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 27 03:50:53 PDT 2019
lebedev.ri updated this revision to Diff 222124.
lebedev.ri added a comment.
Revisited tests.
We can quite easily have more than one shift by the same `sext`.
I'm not quite sure where the fix for that should be.
Here i'm proposing to do that in instcombine, by checking
that all uses of such `sext` are shifts.
This is obviously O(N^2) iff the `sext` is also used by a non-shift.
Thoughts?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68103/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68103
Files:
llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineShifts.cpp
llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/load-cmp.ll
llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/shift-by-signext.ll
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D68103.222124.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5401 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20190927/ab199c26/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list