[PATCH] D62388: [FPEnv] PowerPC Vector Constrained FP Intrinsics Test

[Kevin P. Neal via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

kpn added a comment.

Drew is working with me here at SAS Institute, Inc.

In D62388#1516530 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D62388#1516530>, @hfinkel wrote:

> Just to clarify, do you currently expect all of these lowerings to be semantically correct, or only to mirror the regular lowering path right now?


They should mirror the regular lowering path at least for the most part. Is there a case in this test where that produces semantically incorrect results?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D62388/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D62388