[PATCH] D61941: [llvm-objdump]Improve testing of some switches #1
George Rimar via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu May 16 01:30:58 PDT 2019
grimar added a comment.
I only have a minor comment (inlined).
Out of curiosity are you doing some code coverage check on the llvm-objdump to find the places uncovered?
Asking because I did that few times for LLD and this gave interesting results that time (IMO). I added many test cases and found few interesting bugs and a dead code pieces.
(i.e. if not - I can try to do that and share the results).
================
Comment at: test/tools/llvm-objdump/section-filter.test:222
+# NO-SECTION-NOT: .bss
+# NO-SECTION-NOT: foobar
----------------
Will it be better/simpler just to check no output explicitly?
i.e. something like
```
# NO-SECTION: Sections:
# NO-SECTION-NOT: {{.*}}
```
(not sure this is valid, but shows the idea)
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61941/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D61941
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list