[PATCH] D59450: [ValueTracking] Use ConstantRange overflow check for signed add (NFC)
Roman Lebedev via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Mar 17 03:08:44 PDT 2019
lebedev.ri added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp:4104-4105
+ APInt Lower = Known.One, Upper = ~Known.Zero;
+ Lower.setSignBit();
+ Upper.clearSignBit();
+ return ConstantRange(Lower, Upper + 1);
----------------
This seems like the only non-obvious place here.
There are tests that will fail if it is written **any** other way?
Repository:
rL LLVM
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59450/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59450
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list