[PATCH] D48857: Also search BitcodeFiles for exclude-lib symbols

[Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

dexonsmith added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D48857#1153575, @ruiu wrote:

> Is that part of our coding standard? In lld, all local variables holding
>  function-like objects are in CamelCase, not in camelCase.


Last I checked the coding standard did not call out local variables that are function-like specifically.  I've seen them both ways in LLVM, and I prefer aligning them with other functions than with local variables.

If lld is entirely consistent don't let me get in the way.


Repository:
  rLLD LLVM Linker

https://reviews.llvm.org/D48857