[PATCH] D39192: [ARM] processInstruction must return true if it makes a change

[Renato Golin via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

rengolin added a comment.

We don't hit it by luck is not a good reason. Is it possible to exercise that with a simple MC pattern or not?

Should be simple to add those to existing tests, and it's odd that we have those patterns for years and they have never been tested.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D39192