[PATCH] D35351: [llvm-readobj] - Teach readobj to print DT_FILTER dynamic tag in human readable form.

[George Rimar via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

grimar added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D35351#807913, @emaste wrote:

> Should we instead switch DT_NEEDED to be like DT_AUXILIARY? This would be similar to the format used by binutils readelf and ELF Tool Chain readelf.


Ah, now I see why I did it in that way for DT_AUXILIARY in https://reviews.llvm.org/D24138. I was wondering today why I implemented such a inconsistent output format that time :)
So do what other think ? Should we be consistent with other readelf utils it seems ?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D35351