[PATCH] D34089: [llvm-stress] Ensure that the C++11 random device respects its min/max values (PR32585)

[Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

RKSimon added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34089#779145, @mclow.lists wrote:

> > Is there a C++11 random class that covers the features we need (same results on different targets, drivable by input seed)?
>
> Given that the libc++ `mersenne_twister_engine` tests test specifically that, yes.
>
> see <libc++ root>/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.mers/ctor_sseq.pass.cpp


I've created https://reviews.llvm.org/D34157 for the refactor which is going to take a few days, in the meantime are there any objections to committing this patch to fix PR32585's current assertion in fuzz testing?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D34089