[PATCH] D34089: [llvm-stress] Ensure that the C++11 random device respects its min/max values (PR32585)
Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 13 09:54:15 PDT 2017
RKSimon added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34089#779023, @mclow.lists wrote:
> After thinking about this, I agree with @bogner 's comment that we should just remove the whole `Random` class, and use the C++11 random number facilities instead.
Is there a C++11 random class that covers the features we need (same results on different targets, drivable by input seed)?
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D34089
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list