[PATCH] D34089: [llvm-stress] Ensure that the C++11 random device respects its min/max values (PR32585)

[Simon Pilgrim via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

RKSimon added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34089#779023, @mclow.lists wrote:

> After thinking about this, I agree with @bogner 's comment that we should just remove the whole `Random` class, and use the C++11 random number facilities instead.


Is there a C++11 random class that covers the features we need (same results on different targets, drivable by input seed)?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D34089