[PATCH] D34089: [llvm-stress] Ensure that the C++11 random device respects its min/max values (PR32585)

[Marshall Clow via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

mclow.lists added a comment.

After thinking about this, I agree with @bogner 's comment that we should just remove the whole `Random` class, and use the C++11 random number facilities instead.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D34089