[PATCH] D33099: AMD Jaguar scheduler doesn't correctly model 256-bit AVX instructions
Andrew V. Tischenko via Phabricator via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 1 05:53:40 PDT 2017
avt77 added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33099#769806, @RKSimon wrote:
> I really don't understand why you are having to change the throughput calculation as part of this - split this as another patch?
In this case I should move the test changes for zerroall and zeroupper in a separate patch as well, right?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33099
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list