[PATCH] D33099: AMD Jaguar scheduler doesn't correctly model 256-bit AVX instructions

[Andrew V. Tischenko via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

avt77 added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33099#769806, @RKSimon wrote:

> I really don't understand why you are having to change the throughput calculation as part of this - split this as another patch?


In this case I should move the test changes for zerroall and zeroupper in a separate patch as well, right?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D33099