[PATCH] D30941: Better testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs

[Hal Finkel via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

hfinkel added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30941#702652, @avt77 wrote:

> The implementation was moved to target independent area and all Hal's comments were applied. I did not do anything with Throughput: it will be done in the patch.


Do you mean that the throughput will be done in a follow-up patch (or a later revision of this one)? Either is fine with me, although if we're going to add more than latencies we might pick a different name. More later...


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30941