[PATCH] D30673: Don't emit inrange for vtable address point when it is not in range.

[Evgeniy Stepanov via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

eugenis added a comment.

Actually, after sleeping on it, I'm starting to think it's the global split pass that is wrong. One-byte-after is explicitly allowed in the specification for inrange, but the splitting pass simply does not have enough information w/o relying on the knowledge of itanium abi.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D30673