[PATCH] D30673: Don't emit inrange for vtable address point when it is not in range.

[Eli Friedman via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

efriedma added a comment.

I can't see how whether the inrange marking is correct could depend on whether the array of virtual methods is empty; AFAIK, it doesn't actually change the layout of anything else. Could you explain in a bit more detail why you think there's a bug in the emission of the inrange marking, as opposed to a bug in the global split pass?


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D30673